100nF

TVS clamping voltage checker

The comparison a TVS datasheet is asking you to make: the standoff voltage against the line's normal swing, the IEC strike translated into TLP current, and the clamping voltage at that current — read off the dynamic-resistance line — against what the protected pin tolerates.

datasheet 8.2 V @ 5 Apin limit 12 V10.3 V @ 16 Astrike current
Fig 1 — the TLP line: 10.3 V at 16 A against a 12 V pin — clamped below the limit.
Strike current
16 A TLP for ±8 kV contact (SLLA305 Table 4-10)
Clamp at that current
10.29 V along the TLP line
Standoff
OK — 2.20 V above the 3.3 V line
Downstream pin
protected — 1.71 V under its 12 V limit

The comparison passes on paper. The layout still decides: the diode belongs at the connector, its ground return must not detour, and a strike that can bypass it through a nearby trace will. TI SLVA680 covers the placement rules.

How this is calculated

Standard: TI SLLA305 — Reading and Understanding an ESD Protection Data Sheet

VRWM≥VlineV_{RWM} \geq V_{line}
The reverse standoff (working) voltage is the recommended operating voltage of the protected line: below it the diode leaks nanoamps, above it the diode is part of the circuit.
ITLP=2 A/kV:2 kV→4 A,    8 kV→16 AI_{TLP} = 2 \,\text{A/kV}: \quad 2\,\text{kV} \to 4\,\text{A}, \;\; 8\,\text{kV} \to 16\,\text{A}
SLLA305 Table 4-10, the equivalence between IEC 61000-4-2 contact levels and TLP current — clamping voltages are most often specified at the 16 A / 8 kV point.
Vclamp(I)=Vclamp(Iref)+Rdyn⋅(I−Iref)V_{clamp}(I) = V_{clamp}(I_{ref}) + R_{dyn} \cdot (I - I_{ref})
The TLP line: SLLA305 derives clamping voltages from the TLP plot’s breakdown point and dynamic resistance. The tests reproduce its example device (8.2 V at 5 A, 0.19 Ω → 10.4 V at 16 A) to within 0.15 V.
Vclamp(Ipeak)≤Vpin,maxV_{clamp}(I_{peak}) \leq V_{pin,max}
The verdict: what the downstream pin sees during the strike, against what it tolerates.

Assumptions

What a TVS actually clamps to

A TVS diode datasheet is a comparison waiting to happen, and most of the bad picks come from comparing the wrong pair of numbers. The breakdown voltage is not what the pin sees. The standoff voltage is not the protection level. The number that reaches the protected pin during a strike is the clamping voltage at the strike current, and TI SLLA305 — a guide to reading these datasheets — is where this page's method comes from.

Three checks, in order. The standoff voltage must sit at or above the line's normal swing, or the diode conducts every day instead of on the bad day. The strike level translates to current — SLLA305's table puts IEC 61000-4-2 contact levels at 2 A of TLP current per kV, which is why clamping voltages are usually specified at 16 A for the 8 kV level. And the clamp at that current, extended along the dynamic-resistance line from wherever the datasheet specified it, must land under what the protected pin tolerates.

Worked example: a 3.3 V line against an 8 kV strike

The defaults are SLLA305's own example device on a 3.3 V line: 5.5 V standoff, clamping specified as 8.2 V at 5 A TLP, dynamic resistance 0.19 Ω, designing for ±8 kV contact.

standoff   5.5 V ≥ 3.3 V                        OK, 2.2 V of margin
strike     ±8 kV contact  →  16 A TLP           (2 A per kV)
clamp      8.2 + 0.19 × (16 − 5)  =  10.29 V
           (datasheet's own 16 A row says 10.4 V — the line is honest)
pin limit  12 V  →  protected, 1.7 V of margin

The instructive failure is picking a much higher-standoff part for the same 3.3 V line "for safety": breakdown scales up with standoff, the clamp scales up with breakdown, and the 12 V pin takes the strike anyway. Standoff close to the line, not far above it, is what protects.

Where the clamping model stops being valid

The straight TLP line is the model, and two device families bend it. Snap-back clamps trigger high and fold back low — extrapolating their clamp linearly overstates it, which at least errs safe. Deep-breakdown varistors do the opposite at high currents. When the datasheet gives a TLP plot, the plot wins over this arithmetic.

The comparison also assumes the strike actually flows through the diode. That is a layout property, not a datasheet one: the diode goes at the connector, before anything else the trace touches; its ground return goes straight down, not on a stub; and no protected trace runs close enough to the unprotected side to take the hit inductively. A perfect part in the wrong place clamps nothing.

Surge is a different animal wearing the same units. An IEC 61000-4-5 8/20 µs pulse at 6 A carries orders of magnitude more energy than an ESD strike at 16 A; the clamp arithmetic here still applies via the custom current, but the part must also carry a surge power rating (P_PP) that covers it, which this page does not check.

Common TVS selection mistakes

Further reading