LDO dissipation and junction temperature
What a linear regulator turns into heat, how hot its junction runs at the θJA it actually has, the θJA the design would need to stay inside its limit, and roughly how much copper buys that — plus the dropout check that decides whether it regulates at all.
The rail feeding the regulator, at its highest realistic value — dissipation and dropout are both worst-cased by the extremes, in opposite directions.
The regulated output. Every volt between input and output is dropped across the pass element at the full load current.
Load current. If it varies, size the thermals for the sustained maximum; short peaks ride on the package thermal mass.
Ground-pin current from the datasheet, drawn from the input and burned at the full input voltage. Micropower parts sit at a few µA, classic regulators at several mA.
Junction-to-ambient thermal resistance from the datasheet — measured on a JEDEC test board, not yours. SOT-23 parts run around 200 °C/W, SOT-223 around 60, exposed-pad packages lower still if the pad is actually connected to copper.
Junction-to-case (exposed pad) resistance, usually under 10 °C/W. Only the board-area estimate uses it.
Air temperature around the board — inside the enclosure, not the room. 50 °C is a fair default for sealed electronics at a 25 °C desk.
The junction temperature the design accepts, not necessarily the 125 or 150 °C absolute maximum — electrolytic capacitors nearby and long-term reliability both argue for less.
Dropout voltage at this load from the datasheet. Below it the pass element saturates and the output follows the input minus the drop, unregulated.
- Dissipation
- 855 mW · efficiency 66 %
- Junction temperature
- 101.3 °C (23.7 °C of margin)
- Max load at this θJA
- 732 mA before Tj reaches 125 °C
- Required θJA
- 87.7 °C/W to hold 125 °C at this load
- Copper area for that
- about 6.4 cm² of solid pour, both sides, still air
- Headroom
- 1.70 V above the output · dropout needs 0.30 V
How this is calculated
Standard: TI SNVA419 (AN-2020) — Thermal Design By Insight, Not Hindsight
- The power balance: everything that enters and does not leave is heat. The pass element drops the headroom at the load current; the ground-pin current burns the full input voltage.
- SNVA419’s single-resistor model: the junction sits above ambient by the dissipation times the junction-to-ambient thermal resistance.
- The required-θJA method of SNVA419 section 2.1: its example turns a 40 °C allowed rise at 0.94 W into a 42.5 °C/W target.
- Rule 1 of SNVA419: the board area that reaches a target θJA with solid copper pours on both sides in still air. Airflow can roughly halve it.
- The efficiency an LDO is allowed: bounded by the voltage ratio no matter how good the silicon is.
Assumptions
- One thermal resistance in steady state, in still air. Transients ride on the package and board thermal mass, which this model does not carry.
- The datasheet θJA was measured on a JEDEC test board, not yours: a small board with poor pours runs hotter, a large one with stitched planes cooler. That is what the required-θJA and area rows are for.
- Rule 1 assumes solid copper both sides connected to the pad, natural convection, and no enclosure choking the airflow.
- Dropout is treated as one number; real dropout varies with load and temperature. Take the datasheet value at your current and the hot corner.
- Foldback, thermal shutdown and current limits are the part’s own protections and are not modelled — this page is about not invoking them.
What sets an LDO's junction temperature
A linear regulator is a resistor with feedback. Every volt between input and output is dropped across the pass element at the full load current, and the ground-pin current burns the entire input voltage on top. None of that is a defect — it is the price of the quiet output — but it all surfaces as junction temperature, and the junction does not care that the schematic looked innocent.
The model is TI AN-2020's single resistor: the junction sits θJA·P above ambient. The tool runs it in both directions — the temperature this part reaches with the datasheet θJA, and the θJA the design would need to hold its limit — and then applies AN-2020's Rule 1 to say what that target costs in copper: 500 °C·cm²/W divided by the thermal headroom, solid pours both sides, still air.
The catch the θJA article is about applies with full force here: the datasheet number was measured on a JEDEC board, and yours is not one. Treat the Tj row as an estimate whose error bar is your layout, and the required-θJA row as the specification your layout has to meet.
Worked example: 5 V to 3.3 V at 500 mA in a 50 °C box
The defaults: 5 V in, 3.3 V out at 500 mA, 1 mA ground current, a SOT-223-class θJA of 60 °C/W, 50 °C inside the box, 125 °C allowed.
P_D = (5 − 3.3) × 0.5 + 5 × 0.001 = 0.855 W
η = 1.65 / 2.505 = 66 %
T_J = 50 + 60 × 0.855 = 101.3 °C (23.7 °C of margin)
I_max = (75 / 60 − 0.005) / 1.7 = 732 mA at this θJA
θJA req = 75 / 0.855 = 87.7 °C/W
area = 500 / (87.7 − 10) = 6.4 cm² of two-sided pourThis one lives, with margin. Move the same part to a 12 V rail and the arithmetic turns on it: PD = 4.36 W, the junction "reaches" 311 °C — which is to say the part hits thermal shutdown long before — and the required θJA of 17 °C/W is beyond what any amount of board copper reaches on this package. That design needs a switcher in front, which is what the efficiency row has been hinting at.
Where the thermal model stops being valid
Steady state only. A regulator that sees 2 A for 100 ms every few seconds is a thermal-mass problem, and this model will condemn designs that are actually fine. Conversely, still air is load-bearing: seal the board in a potted enclosure and Rule 1's constant is optimistic.
θJA is not a property of the package alone. An exposed-pad part with the pad soldered to a stitched plane can halve its datasheet number; the same part with the pad floating can double it. The via stitching that makes the difference is thevia calculator's territory — AN-2020 puts a single 12-mil thermal via at 261 °C/W, which is why they come in arrays.
The dropout row is a gate, not a fine measurement. Dropout rises with load and temperature, and a design that clears it by 50 mV at 25 °C may not at 85 °C. When the headroom is thin, check the datasheet curve, not just this number.
Common LDO thermal mistakes
- Reading θJA as a constant of the package. It is a measurement of a package on a particular board. The two rows this tool adds — required θJA and the copper to reach it — exist because the datasheet number is the starting bid, not the answer.
- Sizing for the typical input. Dissipation is worst at maximum input voltage and dropout at minimum; a battery-fed LDO has to survive both ends of the discharge curve.
- Forgetting the ground current. At light loads a classic regulator's several mA of I_q can dominate the dissipation and ruin a sleep-mode power budget that looked fine on paper.
- Setting Tj max to the absolute maximum. 125 °C at the junction is a hot package heating everything around it — the electrolytic capacitor next door ages by its own datasheet, not the regulator's.
- Fixing thermals with a bigger heat number instead of less heat. Past about 50 % efficiency loss, a buck ahead of the LDO removes watts, where copper only spreads them.
Further reading
- TI SNVA419, AN-2020 Thermal Design By Insight, Not Hindsight — the thermal resistance model, the required-θJA method, and the board-area and via rules of thumb this page implements.
- TI SNOA967, PCB layout guidelines for surface-mount temperature sensors — the same via and copper arithmetic worked from the other direction, keeping heat away from a part instead of out of one.
- TI SLUAAD6, Thermal Performance Optimization of High Power Density Buck Converters — measured board variants showing how far layout moves a real θJA.
- LDO dropout calculator — the headroom at the lowest input, where the problem is regulation rather than heat, with the dissipation across the whole input range.