100nF

Voltage divider

Output voltage of a resistive divider, the current it burns, and what each resistor dissipates. It also gives you the nearest E24 part and what that substitution actually does to the output.

Vin 5.00 VR110.0 kΩVout2.50 VR210.0 kΩI = 250 µA
Fig 1 — Unloaded divider. 250 µA flows through the chain at all times.
Output
2.50 V
Nearest E24
10.0 kΩ → 2.50 V
Chain current
250 µA
P in R1 / R2
625 µW · 625 µW
Output impedance (Thevenin)
5.00 kΩ
Worst case, ±1 % parts
2.48 V to 2.52 V (1.00 %)

What it computes

Two resistors in series across a source, output taken from the junction. With nothing connected to the output the current through both resistors is the same, so the output is just the source scaled by the ratio of the lower leg to the total. That is Ohm's law and Kirchhoff's voltage law, nothing more; there is no standard to cite because there is nothing to standardise.

Vout = Vin · R2 / (R1 + R2)
I    = Vin / (R1 + R2)
P_R1 = I² · R1
P_R2 = I² · R2

The second mode inverts the same equation to find the lower resistor for a target output, given the upper one:

R2 = R1 · Vout / (Vin − Vout)

The calculator then snaps R2 to the nearest E24 value (IEC 60063, closest in log distance) and recomputes the output with that part, because the number you solved for is never a number you can buy.

Worked example

A 12 V rail monitored by a 3.3 V ADC. Upper resistor fixed at 27 kΩ, solve for the lower one.

R2 = 27 000 · 3.3 / (12 − 3.3)
   = 89 100 / 8.7
   = 10 241 Ω

nearest E24 = 10 kΩ

Vout (10 kΩ) = 12 · 10 000 / 37 000 = 3.243 V
I            = 12 / 37 000          = 324.3 µA
P_R1         = (324.3e-6)² · 27 000 = 2.84 mW
P_R2         = (324.3e-6)² · 10 000 = 1.05 mW

Entering 12 V, 27 kΩ, 10 kΩ in output-voltage mode gives 3.24 V, 324 µA, 2.84 mW and 1.05 mW (three significant figures). Both dissipations are far under a 0603's 100 mW rating, so power is not the constraint here; the ratio and the source impedance are.

Now add the two things the calculator deliberately leaves out.

Loading. Looking back into the output, the source impedance is R1 in parallel with R2 (Thevenin). Anything hung on the output is in parallel with R2 and pulls the ratio down.

R_th = 27k ∥ 10k = 7.30 kΩ

load 1 MΩ:   R2' = 10k ∥ 1M   = 9.90 kΩ   Vout = 12 · 9.90 / 36.90 = 3.220 V   (−0.7 %)
load 100 kΩ: R2' = 10k ∥ 100k = 9.09 kΩ   Vout = 12 · 9.09 / 36.09 = 3.023 V   (−6.8 %)

A 100 kΩ load costs almost 7 %, which is more than the ADC's whole error budget. The rule: load impedance at least 100× the Thevenin impedance for a 1 % hit, and even then it is a systematic offset you should calibrate out.

Tolerance. Two 1 % parts, worst case pulling in opposite directions:

R1 +1 %, R2 −1 %:  12 · 9 900 / (27 270 + 9 900)  = 3.196 V   (−1.45 %)
R1 −1 %, R2 +1 %:  12 · 10 100 / (26 730 + 10 100) = 3.291 V   (+1.47 %)

The ratio error is roughly 2 % × R1/(R1+R2), so it approaches the sum of both tolerances when the division ratio is large and about 1 % when the resistors are equal. Same-reel parts track better than that, but you cannot design on it.

Where it stops being valid

Common mistakes

Further reading